|
"If
you would learn the secrets of nature, you must practice more humanity than
others."
Henry David Thoreau (on Francis
Bacon).
The
healthcare crisis is attributed to many factors, but not the suppression of
innovation. Innovation that improves the quality of care, thus reducing
utilization, was advanced twenty years ago as the only solution to healthcare
economics. The ability to stimulate immune function would have vast
implications for health reform, but is held to be unavailable. In reality, the
potent immunostimulating properties of lithium and antidepressants were
documented as early as 1981, but suppressed by vested interests. Some
individuals may have ignored the paradigm shift due to an inability to
understand the research and its implications. The same cannot be said of
journal editors, peer reviewers, members of infection societies, medical school
professors, and government health agencies. In
1981, I published the first of nine reviews on the immunostimulating and
antimicrobial properties of lithium and antidepressants.1-9 In
working with pioneers in prostaglandin research, I learned that these
molecules, when synthesized excessively, depress every component of immune
function. In the early nineteen seventies, many laboratories showed that antidepressants
and lithium inhibit prostaglandins. In 1977, David Horrobin showed that
prostaglandins regulate nucleic acids. Thomas Huxley noted, ”One small
fact can ruin the grandest hypothesis."
Immunostimulation
is highly relevant to all pathogens, including HIV+, MRSA, HAI, many parasitic
disorders including malaria, influenza, and pandemic influenza. It is relevant
to primary immunodeficiency disorders, bioterrorism, and cancer. It has a vast
potential role to play in veterinary medicine, marine biology, and the
preservation of species. To this day, government and private laboratories are
pursuing immunostimulation with a vengeance; they will not succeed, because the
problem was solved more than a quarter of a century ago. In a review I
published in 1983, I proposed that in order to stimulate immune function, an
agent would need to have mood elevating
properties.
It
would seem that none of these facilities do literature searches, or publicize
studies that are inimical to their own interests, and could lead to
cancellation of their funding, or its renewal. Horrobin noted, ”When
clinical progress occurs, research funds related to the problem dry up.”
A patient mentioned that the advent of the polio vaccine was a calamity for
"March of Dimes." “If a cure for cancer emerged,”
he added, “the American Medical Association would suppress it.” I
viewed these remarks as cynical and paranoid, until the roof fell in on my
innovations. While the inertia in implementing medical advances is often
attributed to “resistance” or "prematurity," ethical
violations would seem to be the factors in common.11 Over the past quarter
of a century, I appealed to more than a thousand prominent individuals or
institutions to support the advance, none of whom obliged. Elite medical
journals, specialty infection journals, family practice journals, government
agencies, HIV+ organizations, both national and international, more than sixty
medical schools in the U.S, Canada, Great Britain and South Africa, politicians
at all levels, lay media, twenty two drug companies, and others too numerous to
mention. 11,12,13
In
a village somewhere in Africa, a thirteen year old orphaned by HIV+ is
co-infected with HIV+, T.B, and malaria. As much as I wish to, I cannot spirit
bottles of an antidepressant/immunostimulant to her. Thousands of people and
institutions failed her, and failed us all. That must stand as an egregious,
collective violation of ethics. Is withholding lifesaving treatment from a
million people, less of a transgression than gassing them to death? Francis
Bacon noted that ethics and charity are indispensible components of successful
science. Jonas Salk resisted pressure to patent his vaccine, stating that
nothing should stand in the way of its reaching every human being. The
healthcare crisis may not have been inevitable, or at least it’s
dimensions, were it not for an epidemic of ethical transgressions.
1.Lieb
J. “Immunopotentiation and inhibition of herpes virus activation during
therapy with lithium carbonate. Med Hypoth 1981; 7:885-890 2.
Lieb J. “Remission of herpes virus infection and immunopotentiation with
lithium carbonate: Inhibition of prostaglandin E1 synthesis by lithium may
explain its antiviral, immunopotentiating, and antimanic properties.”
Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Biological Psychiatry, Stockholm.
Biol Psych Perris C, Struwe G, Jansson B. (eds.) 1981 695-698
3.
Horrobin D, Lieb J. “A biochemical basis for the actions of lithium on
behavior and on immunity: relapsing and remitting disorders of inflammation and
immunity such as multiple sclerosis or recurrent herpes as manic-depression of
the immune system.” Med Hypoth 1981; 7:891-905
4.
Lieb J. “Remission of rheumatoid arthritis and other disorders of
immunity in patients taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors.” Int J Immunopharmac
1983; 5(4): 353-357
5.
Lieb J, “Lithium and immune function.” Med Hypoth 1987; 23:73-93
6.
Lieb J. “Invisible antivirals.” Int J Immunopharm 1994; 16:1, 1-5
7.
Lieb J. “Lithium and antidepressants: Inhibiting eicosanoids,
stimulating immunity and defeating microorganisms.” Med Hypoth 2002;
59(4): 429-432
8.
Lieb J. “The immunostimulating and antimicrobial properties of lithium
and antidepressants.” J Infection 2004; 49(2): 88-93
9.
Lieb, J. “Lithium and antidepressants: stimulating immunity and reversing
infection.” Med Hypoth (2007) 69 ;(1): 8-11
10.
Manku MS and Horrobin DF. Chloroquine, quinine, procaine, quinidine and
clomipramine are prostaglandin agonists and antagonists. Prostaglandins 1976 Nov;
12(5):789-901
11. Horrobin DF.
Effective clinical innovation: an ethical imperative. Lancet. 2002 May 25;
359(9320):1857-8. .
12. Horrobin DF. Are
large clinical trials in rapidly lethal diseases usually unethical? Lancet 2003 Feb 22; 361(9358):695-7.
13. Horrobin DF.
Beyond conflicts of interest: Non- financial conflicts are more serious than
financial. BMJ.1999
Feb 13; 318(7181):466. |